A buyer’s guide to the leading brand naming agencies, what each does best, and how to match a naming partner to your industry, stage, risk profile, and budget.
Who should read this guide
If you are responsible for naming a company, product, service, or portfolio, choosing the right naming partner is one of the highest-leverage decisions you will make. A brand name is the most repeated, longest-lived, and least changeable asset a brand owns. Getting it right is worth the diligence; getting it wrong is expensive to undo.
This guide is written for the people who actually commission naming work: chief marketing officers, brand and product marketing leaders, founders, innovation teams, and the procurement and strategy professionals who support them. It covers 18 of the most established and frequently recommended naming agencies, organized by what they do best rather than ranked 1 to 18, because the “best” agency is the one that fits your specific situation.
We did not crown a single winner. In high-stakes naming, the right partner depends on your category, risk tolerance, scope of work, timeline, budget, and creative preferences. What follows is a framework for thinking that through, a transparent explanation of how we evaluated each firm, and honest profiles of where each agency is strongest and where another firm might serve you better.
A note on our perspective: Catchword is a naming agency, and we are included in this guide alongside our peers and competitors. We have tried to describe every firm, including our own, the way an informed industry observer would. Where we reference Catchword’s record, we point to third-party evidence, such as independent review rankings and awards, rather than self-assessment.
How we evaluated naming agencies
There is no single official ranking of naming agencies. Directories such as Clutch, DesignRush, The Manifest, GoodFirms, and Sortlist rank firms largely on verified client reviews and self-reported data, which is useful but partial. To build a fuller picture, we assessed each firm against a combination of hard, verifiable signals and softer qualitative ones.
Hard signals (verifiable):
- Longevity — years in operation and continuity of leadership.
- Proven experience — documented and publicly available case studies and project experience.
- Third-party validation — independent review-site rankings, industry awards, and press recognition.
- Specialization — whether naming is the firm’s core discipline or one service within a broader offering.
- Pricing tier — the firm’s typical fee range for naming projects.
Soft signals (qualitative):
- Methodology — whether the firm has an established process spanning strategy, creative development, linguistic screening, and trademark evaluation.
- Team depth — the size, seniority, and range of expertise of the people doing the work, including strategists, namers, linguists, trademark specialists, and designers.
- Thought leadership — the firm’s published expertise, frameworks, and contribution to the field.
- Client evidence — testimonials, case studies, and evidence that the firm has solved challenging, high-stakes naming problems.
The single most important practical filter is the level of complexity a firm routinely handles. An agency that primarily names small and midsize businesses serving local markets faces a very different set of challenges than a firm working with multinational organizations. Global trademark and linguistic screening, complex brand portfolios, diverse stakeholder groups, domain strategy, and cross-market considerations all raise the degree of difficulty. While that level of complexity isn’t necessary for every project, firms that succeed in these environments have demonstrated an ability to deliver creative results that are pressure-tested against real-world constraints—not just imaginative, but viable.
How to choose a naming agency: a practical decision framework
Choosing the right naming agency begins with understanding your own requirements. These five questions will help you identify the best fit.
- What exactly do you need to name? Naming a single startup is a very different engagement from naming a portfolio of related products, a pharmaceutical brand that must meet regulatory requirements, or a company rebranding after a merger. The scope and complexity of the work should guide your choice of agency.
- What is your geographic scope? A US-only name requires far less linguistic and trademark clearance than a name launching in 20 markets and a dozen languages. Global scope rewards firms with linguistic infrastructure and screening depth.
- How much risk can you tolerate? The greater the legal, regulatory, or reputational risk, the more important it is to work with a firm that emphasizes research, screening, and validation. Highly regulated industries—such as pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and financial services—as well as high-profile launches typically require a more rigorous process than lower-risk projects.
- Do you need naming only, or naming plus identity and strategy? Some agencies focus exclusively on naming, while others offer naming as part of a broader branding engagement that includes strategy, visual identity, messaging, and design.
- What’s your budget? Professional naming generally ranges from $15,000 for boutique or lower-complexity work to $150,000 or more for comprehensive global programs. Be wary of bargain options that skip strategy and legal screening, which is where the real risk lives.
A useful rule of thumb: choose the most specialized firm whose expertise matches the complexity and scope of your project. If naming is the primary challenge, a dedicated naming agency will typically bring greater depth of process, experience, and creativity than a branding firm where naming is one service among many. If naming is just one part of a broader brand transformation, an integrated branding agency may be the more efficient choice.
Best fit at a glance
| If you need… | Consider |
|---|---|
| End-to-end naming partner (from strategy through visual identity) | Catchword |
| Global linguistic and phonetic expertise | Lexicon Branding |
| Bold, evocative real-word names | Zinzin, Igor |
| Consumer, food & beverage, beauty, and DTC brands | Eat My Words, Catchword, River + Wolf, Lexicon Branding |
| Technology, SaaS, AI, and innovation brands | Catchword, A Hundred Monkeys, NameStormers, Lexicon Branding |
| Biotech, medical technology, and healthcare naming | Brand Institute, Catchword, River + Wolf |
| Pharmaceutical naming and FDA clearance | Brand Institute |
| Enterprise naming-of-record, portfolio architecture, and naming systems | The Naming Group, Catchword |
| Private equity portfolio companies (NewCos, MergeCos, HoldCos) | Matchstic, The Naming Group, Catchword, Landor |
| Boutique, senior-led naming engagements | River + Wolf, Zinzin |
| Clear, durable, descriptive-leaning names | Tungsten Branding |
| Naming strategy and stakeholder alignment | Tanj, The Naming Group |
| Integrated naming, strategy, and visual identity | Catchword, Matchstic, WANT Branding |
| Corporate and B2B brand strategy with naming | Tenet Partners, Tanj |
| Global brand transformation where naming is one component | Interbrand, Landor, Siegel+Gale |
Recognized leaders in naming
The following firms have built their reputations on naming. Many also provide brand strategy, positioning, research, brand architecture, visual identity, and other branding services, but naming remains their core specialty. For projects where the name is the primary deliverable, this is the category to start with. Firms are listed alphabetically.
A Hundred Monkeys
Notable names: Overture, Miro, Codex, Eero, Olto
One of the oldest naming firms in the U.S., A Hundred Monkeys has spent more than three decades helping companies create names and verbal identities. The agency is known for a story-driven approach that favors names with meaningful narratives rather than purely descriptive or invented constructions, and it has deep roots in the technology and innovation ecosystem. A Hundred Monkeys works closely and collaboratively with clients, making it a strong fit for founders and product teams seeking a hands-on creative partner.
Best for: Tech/innovation naming where story and craft matter.
Consider another firm if: You need large-scale global linguistic and trademark infrastructure or enterprise portfolio architecture.
Brand Institute
Notable names: Lipitor, Levitra, Lunesta, CoolSculpting, Cologuard
Brand Institute is the dominant name in pharmaceutical and healthcare naming. The firm reports involvement in a large share of the drug names approved each year and operates a dedicated regulatory arm (the Drug Safety Institute) built around the FDA, EMA, and global health-authority review process that proprietary drug names must survive. Pharmaceutical naming is a distinct discipline: a multi-stage, often 12-to-18-month process where most candidates are eliminated on safety and regulatory grounds before submission. Few firms can match Brand Institute’s specialized infrastructure for that work.
Best for: Pharmaceutical, medical, biotech, and other regulated healthcare naming requiring health-authority approval.
Consider another firm if: You are naming a consumer, tech, or lifestyle brand where personality and cultural resonance matter more than regulatory clearance.
Catchword
Notable names: Asana, Upwork, Versant (NBCUniversal spinoff), Popcornmeter, Starbucks Refreshers, Volkswagen Atlas
Catchword is consistently recognized as one of the world’s top naming firms. Independent review platform Clutch has ranked it the #1 naming agency globally for multiple consecutive years, and the firm reports having earned more awards for naming work than any other agency, including multiple Hermes, MUSE, Transform, and MarCom honors. The agency has refined one of the industry’s most proven naming processes, combining exceptional creativity with rigorous evaluation and in-house linguistic and trademark expertise. From strategy and naming through visual identity, clients can build distinctive brands with a single integrated partner.
Best for: Enterprise and growth-stage companies seeking end-to-end naming with strategic rigor, exceptional creativity, rigorous screening, and the option to extend into visual identity. Particularly strong in biotech, healthcare, and private equity portfolio companies, including NewCos, MergeCos, and HoldCos.
Consider another firm if: Your organization requires the scale of a global, multi-office consultancy, or you’re seeking a partner for substantial post-branding work such as website development, demand generation, or channel marketing.
Eat My Words
Notable names: Wendy’s Baconator, Neato vacuum, Smitten ice cream, Spoon Me, Plenty
Founder Alexandra Watkins wrote Hello, My Name Is Awesome, a well-regarded naming book, and developed the “SMILE and SCRATCH” test, a memorable framework for evaluating whether a name delights or confuses. The firm is well suited to consumer, food and beverage, beauty, and DTC brands seeking names with voice, charm, and lasting appeal.
Best for: Consumer, DTC, food and beverage, and lifestyle names with personality and wit.
Consider another firm if: You need enterprise B2B, technical, or regulated naming, or you’re managing a complex global naming effort that demands extensive screening and stakeholder alignment.
Igor
Notable names: Gogo, TruTV, Aria (Las Vegas), Tango (healthcare), Neoverse (AI processor)
Igor built its reputation on a strong preference for bold, evocative real-word names over safe, descriptive, or blended constructions. The firm’s philosophy is that memorable, distinctive names outperform more literal executions, a viewpoint reflected in both its client work and widely read naming guide. For organizations looking to stand apart rather than blend into their category, Igor is a natural fit.
Best for: High-distinctiveness, memorable names for brands willing to be bold.
Consider another firm if: Your project is likely to require coined names—for example, because of global trademark and linguistic constraints, extensive international screening, or the demands of a highly regulated industry.
Lexicon Branding
Notable names: Pentium, BlackBerry, Swiffer, Febreze, Sonos, Lucid
One of the founding firms of the modern naming industry, Lexicon is known for its science-driven naming process, built on decades of work in sound symbolism and applied linguistics. The firm’s distinctive edge is research into how the sounds of a name shape perception, and rigorous cross-language validation. For global names where linguistic performance is mission-critical, Lexicon is in a class of its own.
Best for: Global naming where linguistic and phonetic performance is paramount.
Consider another firm if: You want a highly collaborative, workshop-driven creative process, a broader branding partner, or a boutique or mid-market budget.
NameStormers
Notable names: Angry Orchard, Tapestry Collection by Hilton, CarMax, Canon PowerShot, PureBalance
One of the oldest naming firms, NameStormers has spent four decades developing company, product, and service names across B2B, technology, consumer, healthcare, hospitality, and nonprofit sectors. The firm is known for a highly collaborative, hands-on process that pairs creative exploration with thorough trademark, linguistic, and consumer validation. Rather than championing a single naming philosophy, NameStormers emphasizes practical, well-rounded solutions tailored to each client’s needs. Its flexible engagement model and long track record make it a dependable choice for organizations ranging from startups to the Fortune 500.
Best for: Methodical, experienced naming across sectors, with flexibility on project size.
Consider another firm if: You need global enterprise scale, regulated pharmaceutical naming, or a large multidisciplinary team for high-volume work.
River + Wolf
Notable names: Versuni, Planteray, Ampersand, Ghostery, AHA (seltzer), ORIGIN/De Beers
River + Wolf is a boutique naming agency known for linguistically rich, evocative work and direct access to senior creative leadership. Founded by published author and poet Margaret Wolfson, the firm brings a literary sensibility to naming alongside strategic rigor. River + Wolf has extensive experience serving international clients, with risk-aware workflows and screening expertise that support multilingual and cross-border naming programs, including those in regulated sectors such as biotech, medical devices, and healthcare. For organizations that value a close, senior-led partnership, the boutique model is a distinct strength.
Best for: Boutique, senior-led naming for organizations seeking evocative, literary brand names and international naming expertise.
Consider another firm if: You need a large team, global offices, or high-volume enterprise scale.
Tanj
Notable names: FilmStruck, Veem, Centivo, Natural Bliss, OnePass
Tanj is a naming and verbal-identity studio that positions itself around research-driven, strategy-first work, with competitive audits and strategy before ideation. The firm publishes extensively on naming and emphasizes decision-support frameworks designed to reduce stakeholder conflict. It is a credible choice for teams that want a strategy-forward process and a partner active in naming thought leadership.
Best for: Research- and strategy-first naming and verbal identity for startups through enterprises.
Consider another firm if: You need pharmaceutical or other health-authority-regulated naming, or enterprise-scale capacity with a large global team.
The Naming Group
Notable names: Chevrolet Sonic & Trax, Capital One Venture, HP Amplify, Kohler Elevance, Bowflex VeloCore
The Naming Group focuses on enterprise naming, brand architecture, and portfolio strategy for large organizations. Its model brings together custom teams of strategists, linguists, trademark attorneys, and naming specialists for each engagement, drawing on Fortune 500 experience. The firm is particularly well suited to organizations managing complex portfolios, naming systems, and large-scale brand transformations.
Best for: Enterprise naming-of-record, portfolio strategy, and naming architecture.
Consider another firm if: You’re an early-stage startup with a single naming need and a limited budget.
Tungsten Branding
Notable names: PODS, Bagster, TeamLogicIT, Rally House, SmoothGlo, AutoSavvy
Tungsten focuses exclusively on naming, with a philosophy of strategic fit, linguistic durability, and “clarity over cleverness.” It favors real-word and descriptive-leaning names built to last rather than trend-driven coinages, and its work includes recognizable brands such as PODS and Bagster. The firm serves clients from startups to large enterprises and is often cited as a strong value option for clear, durable naming. The firm is also very knowledgeable about domain names and domain acquisition.
Best for: Real-word, clarity-first, durable names, often at a more accessible price point.
Consider another firm if: You want highly abstract coined names or a global brand consultancy with full identity services.
Zinzin
Notable names: Clutch, truTV, Ember, Mack Pioneer, Highwire, Quilt, Kantata
Led by industry veteran Jay Jurisich, Zinzin champions evocative, metaphor-rich “power names” over literal or descriptive ones. Its Naming & Branding Manifesto argues that great names should “show, not tell”—expressing a brand’s positioning through suggestion and association rather than explanation—and that the strongest names earn meaning over time. That philosophy is paired with a disciplined naming process, making Zinzin a strong choice for organizations seeking distinctive, enduring names backed by a clear creative point of view.
Best for: Evocative, metaphor-driven names for brands that want a strong creative point of view.
Consider another firm if: You need full visual identity, or you prefer to consider a wider array of naming styles and constructions, including coinages and compounds.
Branding firms with naming capabilities
For the firms below, naming is one component of an integrated branding practice that spans strategy, identity, and design. If your project extends beyond naming into a broader brand initiative or transformation, this is the category to start with. Firms are listed alphabetically.
Interbrand
Notable names: Wi-Fi, Prozac, Viagra, Imation, oneworld
Interbrand is one of the world’s best-known brand consultancies, a pioneer in brand valuation, and the publisher of the influential Best Global Brands ranking. Naming is one part of a comprehensive offering that includes brand strategy, architecture, identity, experience, and valuation, delivered at global enterprise scale. With decades of experience spanning high-profile corporate and pharmaceutical naming, Interbrand is particularly well suited to large, complex brand transformations.
Best for: Full brand transformation and architecture at global enterprise scale, with naming as one element.
Consider another firm if: Naming is your primary need and you want the depth of a dedicated naming specialist, a more hands-on boutique engagement, or a lower-cost option.
Landor
Notable names: Lucent Technologies, Altria, Agilent, Accenture, Zepto, Opella, Vivanta
Landor is one of the world’s foundational branding consultancies, founded by industry pioneer Walter Landor and now part of WPP. The firm specializes in large-scale brand strategy, identity, experience, and transformation for global organizations, with naming integrated into that broader offering. It is a frequent choice for Fortune 500 companies undertaking rebrands, mergers, portfolio rationalization, and international expansion.
Best for: Enterprise brand programs, rebrands, and identity systems at global scale, including merger and private equity portfolio company naming.
Consider another firm if: Naming is your primary need and you’re looking for the depth, accessibility, or pricing of a dedicated naming boutique.
Matchstic
Notable names: Atlanta Drive GC, Ollion, Brightwild, Yarrow, Vivery
Matchstic is a respected branding consultancy that has built a strong naming practice alongside brand strategy, visual identity, messaging, and brand architecture. The firm is known for integrating naming into a broader brand-building process, ensuring that names align closely with positioning, identity, and customer experience rather than being developed in isolation. Matchstic works with organizations ranging from founders and growth-stage companies to established enterprises, and is particularly well regarded in the Southeast. For clients seeking a cohesive brand developed from strategy through identity, Matchstic is a thoughtful, well-rounded partner.
Best for: Naming as part of full brand identity and strategy, especially for founders and private equity portfolio companies.
Consider another firm if: You need a pure, globally focused naming specialist or regulated pharmaceutical naming.
Siegel+Gale
Notable names: Novartis, Solventum, TEGNA, Centrient, Breakthrough T1D
Siegel+Gale is built around a single, enduring idea: simplicity. The firm is known for helping large, complex organizations express their brands with greater clarity, aligning naming, messaging, identity, and experience with business strategy. Its heritage includes pioneering work in plain language, and naming is integrated into a broader brand transformation practice rather than offered as a standalone specialty. It’s an excellent fit for enterprises seeking clarity, alignment, and organizational coherence across complex stakeholder environments.
Best for: Enterprise naming integrated with brand strategy, particularly for organizations that value clarity, simplicity, and stakeholder alignment.
Consider another firm if: Naming is your primary need and you’re looking for a dedicated naming specialist, or your project calls for a more exploratory, creatively expansive naming process.
Tenet Partners
Notable names: Sourcewell, Cotiviti, ASC Engineered Solutions, Storylines, Aluminz
Tenet Partners specializes in corporate and B2B branding, integrating naming with brand strategy, architecture, measurement, valuation, and design. Formed by the merger of Brandlogic and CoreBrand, with roots reaching back to 1973, the firm brings decades of expertise in quantifying brand performance and linking brand decisions to business value. Naming is part of a broader, strategy-led approach, making Tenet particularly well suited to organizations that want brand decisions informed by research, analytics, and long-term corporate strategy.
Best for: Corporate and B2B branding where naming is integrated with brand strategy, architecture, measurement, and valuation.
Consider another firm if: Naming is your primary need, you’re seeking a more creatively driven naming process, or you prefer the speed and accessibility of a boutique naming specialist.
WANT Branding
Notable names: SiriusXM, Webex, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM Verse, Uber Central
WANT Branding began as a naming consultancy and has grown into a full-service branding firm spanning brand strategy, naming, identity, research, and customer experience. The firm retains a deep commitment to naming—its founder, Jonathan Bell, is a widely recognized thought leader in the field—and brings decades of experience helping global organizations launch new brands, products, and portfolios. For clients seeking naming as part of a broader strategic branding engagement, WANT offers a well-integrated approach.
Best for: Integrated naming, brand strategy, and identity for global organizations and complex brand portfolios.
Consider another firm if: Naming is your sole priority and you want the singular focus or depth of a dedicated naming specialist.
Frequently asked questions
How much does it cost to hire a naming agency?
Professional naming engagements typically range from about $15,000 for boutique or lower-complexity projects to $150,000 or more for global enterprise programs. Pricing depends on the scope of the assignment: the number of naming candidates, the depth of strategy and creative development, the rigor of trademark and linguistic screening, and the number of markets and languages in which the name must work. A name intended for a single country requires far less validation than one launching worldwide. While lower-cost options can be appropriate for simple projects, be cautious of engagements that shortcut strategy or screening. Fixing a name that can’t be trademarked, doesn’t travel across cultures, or fails to support the brand is almost always more expensive than investing in a robust process from the outset.
How long does professional naming take?
Most naming engagements take anywhere from a few weeks to a few months, depending on the complexity of the assignment. Timelines are shaped not only by strategy, creative exploration, and stakeholder alignment, but also by the depth of trademark and linguistic screening required. The most successful projects allow time to explore a wide range of ideas, refine the strongest candidates, and pressure-test them against real-world constraints. Regulated categories take considerably longer: pharmaceutical naming, for example, often spans 12 to 18 months because candidate names must pass a rigorous, multi-stage regulatory safety review before approval.
What is the difference between a naming agency and a branding agency?
A naming agency specializes in verbal identity: creating brand, company, product, and service names that are strategically meaningful, creatively distinctive, linguistically sound, and legally viable. The discipline combines strategy, creative development, linguistics, cultural evaluation, trademark screening, and stakeholder alignment to produce names that can succeed in the real world.
A branding agency typically takes a broader view of the brand, developing strategy, positioning, messaging, visual identity, design systems, and customer experience. Many branding agencies also offer naming, but because it is a specialized discipline, firms known primarily for naming often bring greater depth of creative exploration, linguistic expertise, and trademark rigor.
The distinction is one of specialization, not quality. If naming is the primary challenge, a dedicated naming firm is often the better choice. If naming is one component of a larger brand transformation, an integrated branding agency may be the more effective partner. Some firms—including Catchword—combine world-class naming with brand strategy and visual identity, allowing clients to build a brand from name to identity with a single team.
Do I need a naming specialist, or can a full-service branding firm handle naming?
If naming is the primary challenge, a dedicated naming specialist is usually the better choice. Firms known for naming typically bring deeper expertise in strategy, creative exploration, linguistic evaluation, and trademark screening—particularly for high-stakes, global, or regulated projects where every candidate must survive significant real-world constraints.
If naming is just one part of a broader branding initiative, a full-service branding firm can often deliver a more seamless engagement by integrating naming with brand strategy, positioning, messaging, visual identity, and implementation.
A useful rule of thumb is to match the firm’s specialization to your primary challenge. The more the success of the project depends on finding the right name, the more valuable a dedicated naming specialist becomes. The more the challenge lies in transforming the overall brand, the more an integrated branding consultancy may be the better fit.
What about AI naming tools and name generators?
AI has become a valuable tool in professional naming, but it hasn’t replaced human creativity. It can accelerate research, expand brainstorming, and help teams explore a broader range of possibilities more quickly. The strongest naming firms use AI to increase productivity—not to outsource the creative work. Human namers still develop many of the best ideas themselves, build on AI-generated concepts, recognize unexpected opportunities, and combine insights in ways that current AI cannot reliably replicate.
Creating a successful name also requires strategic thinking, linguistic and cultural judgment, trademark and domain evaluation, and the experience to know which ideas will resonate, differentiate, and endure. For a low-stakes or temporary project, an AI tool may be sufficient. But for a name that will become a long-term business asset, the greatest value comes from experienced naming professionals using every available tool—including AI—to produce and refine the strongest possible candidates.
What should I look for when evaluating a naming agency?
Start with the agency’s portfolio. Look beyond recognizable clients and ask whether the work demonstrates the kind of creativity your project requires. Does the portfolio show a range of naming styles, industries, and business challenges, or does it reflect a narrower specialty or point of view? The answer isn’t inherently good or bad—it should simply match your needs.
Next, examine the firm’s process. A strong methodology goes well beyond brainstorming, combining strategy, creative development, linguistic evaluation, trademark screening, and iterative refinement. It’s also worth asking who will actually do the work. Agencies with experienced, collaborative in-house naming teams often deliver greater consistency than firms that assemble freelancers for each project.
Finally, confirm that the firm’s experience aligns with your project and that trademark, linguistic, and domain screening are integrated into the process rather than treated as optional services.
What are the main types of brand names?
Brand names exist on a spectrum, from highly descriptive to completely abstract. Descriptive names communicate what a company or product does, making them immediately understandable but often less distinctive and more difficult to protect as trademarks. Suggestive names communicate through association, hinting at a benefit, quality, or idea without stating it outright. At the other end of the spectrum are arbitrary and invented names, which are typically the most distinctive, protectable, and flexible, but require more time and marketing to build meaning.
There is no universally “best” type of name. The right choice depends on your category, competitive landscape, trademark considerations, brand strategy, and long-term ambitions. A local service business may benefit from greater clarity, while a global technology company or consumer brand may place a higher premium on distinctiveness, scalability, and legal protectability.
The bottom line
There is no universally “best” naming agency—only the firm that’s best suited to your challenge. The right choice depends on the complexity of the project, the level of creative and strategic rigor required, the need for linguistic and trademark evaluation, the scope of the brand initiative, and your budget. Dedicated naming firms typically offer the greatest depth when the name itself is the primary challenge. Full-service branding agencies are often the better fit when naming is one part of a broader brand transformation. And in highly regulated fields such as pharmaceuticals, specialized expertise is indispensable.
Start by defining the problem you’re trying to solve, then choose the partner whose experience, process, and philosophy best match that challenge.
This guide is maintained by Catchword and reviewed periodically to keep agency information current. Because agency leadership, ownership, capabilities, and locations can change over time, we recommend confirming the latest information directly with any firm you’re considering.
