Walkman vs. iPod

Share

Sony announced last week that it was introducing a new portable music player to compete with Apple’s dominant iPod. The brand name they chose for this dramatic entry into the monstrous digital music category? Something edgy? Something hip? Something exciting? Nope. It’s just another Walkman.

While I can understand Sony’s logic here, I can’t endorse their decision. Ok, “Walkman” has many of the right characteristics for this product. It says “small, portable, music device” in a familiar and friendly way. It is certainly protectable across all borders, and it ties (at least associatively) with the Sony parent brand.

But the name also screams “1985” and “low tech”. In its effort to perpetuate a household brand by tying it to a brand new technology, Sony may have doomed its market share before they even really entered the market. Buyers in this space want a fashion statement, they want innovation, they want excitement. The Walkman brand brings none of those things to the table.

RELATED INSIGHTS

What do expert namers think of the proliferation of "Deep" names? Catchword's take in The Washington Post
02.18.2025
Fast Company tapped the Catchword team to evaluate Dell's new brand architecture. Spoiler: great strategy, meh naming
01.09.2025

Maria is Co-Founder & Creative Director of Catchword Branding and has personally created hundreds of brand names, including Asana, Upwork, Vudu, and

11.25.2024