<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Siffy to Offer Free Wiffy in NYC: &quot;WyFy from SyFy&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catchwordbranding.com/catchthis/name-launch/siffy-to-offer-free-wiffy-in-nyc-wyfy-from-syfy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catchwordbranding.com/catchthis/brand-naming/siffy-to-offer-free-wiffy-in-nyc-wyfy-from-syfy/</link>
	<description>Professional Naming Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 02:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://catchwordbranding.com/catchthis/brand-naming/siffy-to-offer-free-wiffy-in-nyc-wyfy-from-syfy/#comment-2059</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catchwordbranding.com/catchthis/?p=1816#comment-2059</guid>
		<description>The change of name reminds me of the morphing of Fuddruckers brand name in Idiocracy.  Just more evidence that Idiocracy is a true story sent to us from the future.  Syphilis is probably one or two iterations away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The change of name reminds me of the morphing of Fuddruckers brand name in Idiocracy.  Just more evidence that Idiocracy is a true story sent to us from the future.  Syphilis is probably one or two iterations away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CatchThis: The Company Naming and Product Naming Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SyFy: Awful Name, Awesome Ad Campaign</title>
		<link>http://catchwordbranding.com/catchthis/brand-naming/siffy-to-offer-free-wiffy-in-nyc-wyfy-from-syfy/#comment-2058</link>
		<dc:creator>CatchThis: The Company Naming and Product Naming Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SyFy: Awful Name, Awesome Ad Campaign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catchwordbranding.com/catchthis/?p=1816#comment-2058</guid>
		<description>[...] we here at Catchword have pointed out numerous times (here, here, here, here, and here) we can&#8217;t stand the new SyFy brand name. However, we are willing to give credit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we here at Catchword have pointed out numerous times (here, here, here, here, and here) we can&#8217;t stand the new SyFy brand name. However, we are willing to give credit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://catchwordbranding.com/catchthis/brand-naming/siffy-to-offer-free-wiffy-in-nyc-wyfy-from-syfy/#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catchwordbranding.com/catchthis/?p=1816#comment-2057</guid>
		<description>Turns out that Landor Associates *didn&#039;t* come up with &quot;Syfy&quot; -- the internal marketing department did. Landor tried to get them to go with a different name, but the decision had already been made. (Which Dave Howe has pretty much already admitted to.)

As Rob noted above, the exec director even took the unusual step of distancing Landor from the controversy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turns out that Landor Associates *didn&#8217;t* come up with &#8220;Syfy&#8221; &#8212; the internal marketing department did. Landor tried to get them to go with a different name, but the decision had already been made. (Which Dave Howe has pretty much already admitted to.)</p>
<p>As Rob noted above, the exec director even took the unusual step of distancing Landor from the controversy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://catchwordbranding.com/catchthis/brand-naming/siffy-to-offer-free-wiffy-in-nyc-wyfy-from-syfy/#comment-2056</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catchwordbranding.com/catchthis/?p=1816#comment-2056</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more on the crapiness of &quot;SyFy&quot;: http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=175. I like that you&#039;ve tagged this post both &quot;awful names&quot; and &quot;terrible name&quot; just to make sure you&#039;ve covered all the bases. My favorite part of the SyFy debacle is Landor&#039;s attempt to disown the whole thing (http://www.landor.com/index.cfm?do=thinking.blog&amp;post_id=18904&amp;bhcp=1&amp;bhhash=1#top). Hey, maybe it was the client&#039;s &quot;fault,&quot; but it seems a bit unprofessional to point that out.

At one point I&#039;d predicted that they&#039;d pull the whole thing before 7/7, but it&#039;s seeming less and less likely. Do you really think they&#039;ve spent too much on it to turn back now? Running a business based on emotions like buyer&#039;s regret never made much sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more on the crapiness of &#8220;SyFy&#8221;: <a href="http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=175" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.semanticargument.com/?p=175&amp;referer=');">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=175</a>. I like that you&#8217;ve tagged this post both &#8220;awful names&#8221; and &#8220;terrible name&#8221; just to make sure you&#8217;ve covered all the bases. My favorite part of the SyFy debacle is Landor&#8217;s attempt to disown the whole thing (<a href="http://www.landor.com/index.cfm?do=thinking.blog&#038;post_id=18904&#038;bhcp=1&#038;bhhash=1#top" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.landor.com/index.cfm?do=thinking.blog_038_post_id=18904_038_bhcp=1_038_bhhash=1_top&amp;referer=');">http://www.landor.com/index.cfm?do=thinking.blog&#038;post_id=18904&#038;bhcp=1&#038;bhhash=1#top</a>). Hey, maybe it was the client&#8217;s &#8220;fault,&#8221; but it seems a bit unprofessional to point that out.</p>
<p>At one point I&#8217;d predicted that they&#8217;d pull the whole thing before 7/7, but it&#8217;s seeming less and less likely. Do you really think they&#8217;ve spent too much on it to turn back now? Running a business based on emotions like buyer&#8217;s regret never made much sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

